Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -Balance Wealth Academy
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-17 08:57:06
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Ranking
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Average rate on 30
Could your smelly farts help science?